armyreal.com - Forums

Go Back   ArmyReal.com Forums > Life in the Military > Help and Assistance
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #1  
Old 02-17-2009, 01:57 PM
RetroPinupVeronica RetroPinupVeronica is offline
Recruit
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
Default OCONUS, ERD, COT and Command Sponsorship

My husband and I are having a problem with his Germany tour. I will try and keep my explanation concise, but please ask questions if you need clarification.

My husband got accompanied orders to Germany. While he was there I was injured and had to return to the US under an EROD for medical treatment. At that time we were told I would be able to join him upon receipt of new orders that required a PCS.

Fast forward 18 months later. He has a COT which requires a PCS from one OCONUS location in Germany to another location in Germany. His orders are marked "Dependants: YES". We were told by our losing command reassignments office that since it was a new tour there should be no problems with getting command sponsorship and a government paid move. We just need him to apply for command sponsorship at his new command.

He arrives at his new command. Turns in the paperwork for his new tour. Here comes the problem. His S-1 office is stating that his COT is a continuation of his prior tour and is not a PCS. They also say he has to apply to the Garrison Commander for an exception to get me command sponsored and that we have to pay for the move ourselves.

I've done some research through Army regulations and this is what I've found.

AR 614-30 chapter 4 subsection b&c = COT as PCS

AR 55-46 section II 5-7 G = Serving COT entitles government paid move

AR 55-46 Section III 5-8 B = PCS = government paid move

AEP 37-10 ERD and ATD Entitlements family moved from designated location to new PDS

Would anyone be able to confirm that I am reading these regulations correctly and that the COT is indeed a new tour, a PCS and that we are entitled to a government paid move?

One last problem, finance is saying that because his orders state "dependants:yes" that if I am not command sponsored within 90 days we will lose BAH. Is this correct?

Thank you for your help!
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 02-19-2009, 01:32 PM
sdl70 sdl70 is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9
Default

A COT is actually a continuation of overseas tour, but is treated like a PCS if they change locations. I would have your husband request the S-1 to inquire higher regarding the Command Sponsorship and or visit JAG/IG. You will have to go through the exceptional family member screening again and if the services where your husband is now located also can't treat any remaining condition it will be denied.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 02-19-2009, 02:44 PM
tk1188 tk1188 is offline
Private First Class
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 15
Default

he shouldnt not loose his BAH at all i was station overseas myself when i was married n did not loose my BAH when my wife left. the only way he can loose it is if he moves into the barracks but other than that they cant take it away from him just cuz you are not there its bs
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    
·Contact Us   ·Legal   ·Privacy   ·Link To Us    ·Advertise With Us    ·About Us    ·Site Map     
     Copyright 2004-2019 Activv, LLC. All rights reserved. Armyreal.com is a service provided by Activv.
This website is not affiliated, endorsed, authorized, or associated in any way with any government, military or country.